<?xml version="1.0" ?>

                <rss version="2.0"
            xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
            xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
            xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <channel>
                <title>Focus Blog</title>
                <link><![CDATA[http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?rss=all]]></link>
                <description><![CDATA[Focus Blog: 
]]></description>                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:09:38 -0400</pubDate>
                <language>en-US</language><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Don Draper, fake ad executive]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/57-don-draper-fake-ad-executive.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=57</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" alt="" style="width: 133px; height: 148px;" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/jon-hamm-1.jpg" /><em>This entry marks our first analysis of a fictional character but, as Don Draper is something of a leadership archetype, we think some insights can be gained from it.</em></p>
<p><strong>**This article may contain spoilers. Be advised.**</strong></p>
<p><strong>Name:</strong> Don Draper (played by Jon Hamm)<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation:</strong> Central character of AMC's <em>Mad Men</em>. Former Creative Director of Sterling Cooper advertising firm; founding partner at Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce advertising firm<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> After switching identities with the lieutenant he served under during the Korean War (who died in a gasoline explosion), Draper sold used cars and wrote ad copy for a fur company, which is where Sterling Cooper bigwig Roger Sterling discovered him. Draper quickly climbed the ladder to Creative Director, and then Junior Partner, because of his talent for reading people, figuring out what they want, and pitching ideas to them. He's also a tremendous excuse to show off period cars and hot girls in vintage lingerie, which are, let's be honest, the real reasons anyone cares about this show. When a rival ad firm buys out Sterling Cooper, Draper gets himself fired and takes a few coworkers with him to start Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce.<br />
Draper's character is based, at least in name, on Leo Burnett advertising legend Draper Daniels, who created the Marlboro Man campaign. Don Draper beat out actual people Barack Obama and Michael Phelps to be named Ask Men's most influential man of 2009, which is a travesty until you consider that, on the whole, uptight womanizing men in nice suits have done pretty well for themselves throughout history, so why shouldn't it be the same for one whose character flaws and strengths have been obsessively balanced for a show that is essentially an arm of the media congratulating itself?<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Organizer/Collaborator. Draper's character is not an impulsive one - he waits and picks his moment and contains his personal drama better than anyone else on <em>Mad Men</em>. He's also a perceptive guy who can capitalize on how well he reads people, suggesting healthy Collaborative instincts that also influence his ability to separate his professional and personal lives for the benefit of his work environment.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Visionary - now that Don is starting a new firm, he'll need new strategies and more inventive ads to stand even with more established competition. He was really good at pitching ideas that had been digested by a major company, but will he be as good with less staffers and money? He should start with some Loosening Relief exercises to work on his tension and, at the risk of armchair scriptwriting, dip into some of the more creative subcultural activities of the period, or at least pay closer attention to them. His first season beatnik fling notwithstanding, Draper's very much a mainstream guy and that predictability can only get in his way from here on out. Unless the fourth season starts with an asteroid colliding with the earth and wiping out humanity, in which case all this speculation will be completely worthless.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[No Energy Styles--What Does this Mean?]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/56-no-energy-styles--what-does-this-mean.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=56</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>I am reviewing the FEBI reports for the first team I will work with--tomorrow! In one of the reports, under &quot;primary style&quot; and &quot;backup style&quot;, nothing is indicated.  I am not sure how to interpret this. The person's preferences were all &quot;low&quot;, with the exception of the organizer pattern, which was &quot;moderate&quot;. It would seem that no pattern was strong enough to elicit a combination of patterns to make up a style. What would be the best way to approach this in terms of speaking to the lack of style  and what this might mean for this person? The work behavior preferences are quite different, with quite a balanced mix of energy patterns being used throughout. It's almost as if two different people completed these two portions of the assessment!</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarközy, president of France]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/55-nicolas-sarkzy-president-of-france.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=55</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/NicolasSarkozy.jpg" style="width: 152px; height: 127px;" alt="" />Name:</strong> Nicolas Paul St&eacute;phane Sark&ouml;zy de Nagy-Bocsa, aka Nicolas Sark&ouml;zy.<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation:</strong> Current President of the French Republic and ex officio Co-Prince of Andorra. <br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> Grew up just outside Paris in a strongly Catholic family, which was the influence of his Gaullist grandfather (Nicolas rarely saw his actual father, who refused to help the family at all and was generally, if you'll pardon the colloquialism, a total butt-lord). The family situation might explain Sark&ouml;zy's unimpressive academic record; failed the sixi&egrave;me at Lyc&eacute;e Chaptal, mediocre student at the Cours Saint-Louis de Monceau, couldn't graduate from the Institut d'&Eacute;tudes Politiques de Paris because his English wasn't good enough, etc. He also had the distinction of being a right-wing activist at the notoriously left-wing Universit&eacute; Paris X Nanterre. Oops. He still managed to become a lawyer despite all this, specializing in business and family law and Silvio Berlusconi, who is almost a living parody of business and family laws. <br />
Sark&ouml;zy's political career is, in keeping with European politics, hopelessly convoluted, but it began when he became a city councillor in Neuilly-sur-Seine; he was 23. He gained clout by personally negotiating with the &quot;Human Bomb&quot; in 1993, stalling him long enough for RAID officers to sneak in and kill him. From there, his career phased in and out of the circles of power in French politics, as dictated by his weird relationship with Jacques Chirac, but he has eventually staked out a claim for himself as a divisive right-wing politician (whatever that even means in Europe). This isn't even a cursory examination of his road to the presidency, but anything more in-depth would have to be handed down to this writer's heirs to complete. Let's just say that French politics are complicated.<br />
Sark&ouml;zy has been married three times, the details of which were quite popular minor scandals in France, and is reportedly very protective of his image, especially his height. Reuters and the French media claim that he wears lifts in his shoes and stands on boxes to appear taller (he's 5'5&quot;). Why a guy with that much money and power and a supermodel wife would care one iota about this stuff is beyond anyone's comprehension.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Driver. Sark&ouml;zy has certainly been through rough waters in his life, but he has a knack for besting the tide and righting himself and other boating-related metaphors for triumphing over adversity. He has definite goals, and doesn't let being knocked out of favorable positions stop him from pursuing/achieving them. He's almost Nixon-esque in how well he comes back from defeat.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Collaborator/Organizer. Sark&ouml;zy wouldn't have as much adversity to triumph over if his relationships, both professional and personal, didn't change with the weather. He spent a lot of time on the outside looking in, and micromanages the press and his cabinet while putting his foot in his mouth in public. He needs a lot of help working with people on a consistent, longterm basis, and he needs to keep his personal life together or else all that chaos will bleed into his political career, too. A mix of Balanced Composure and Bounce Back exercises would do wonders, as would some art lessons. Sculpting, maybe. And therapy. Can't forget therapy.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Lag time between report generation and coaching?]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/54-lag-time-between-report-generation-and-coaching.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=54</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm working with a few teams right now, setting up &quot;packages&quot; formatted like this:</p>
<p>1. Individuals take FEBI and I send them their reports.</p>
<p>2. Team comes together for an introductory workshop (experiential, designed to let them &quot;feel&quot; the energies and to play and think about them with right-brain activities.</p>
<p>3. I coach individuals one-on-one.</p>
<p>4. Team comes together for a facilitated group meeting where we will work with the team's overall energy patterns to create an action plan for how to work better together as a team.</p>
<p>Do you experienced coaches have a gut feeling for the optimum timing of the four steps?  What's too long between steps, what's too short?  Any advice would be fabulous!</p>
<p>And if you have any other suggestions not related to timing, I'm all ears to anything you want to offer by way of guidance.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Rhonda Morton</p>
<p>Corning, NY</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Jay-Z, rapper/mogul]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/53-jay-z-rappermogul.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=53</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/jayz.JPG" style="width: 129px; height: 126px;" alt="" />Name:</strong> Shawn Corey &quot;Jay-Z&quot; Carter.<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation: </strong>co-owner of the 40/40 Club; part-owner of the New Jersey Nets; creator of Rocawear clothing line. Former CEO of Def Jam Recordings; cofounder of Roc-A-Fella Records; founder of Roc Nation.<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> Jay-Z grew up in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn and, at 12, shot his brother in the shoulder for stealing jewelry. He also dealt crack at one time, which he explores in some of his later music. When he wasn't shooting his siblings, he was keeping them awake all night by banging on pots and pans. Upon receiving a boom box, which his brother wisely decided not to steal, for his birthday, Jay-Z became interested in music. Before long, he was freestyling and writing lyrics, making cameo appearances on several recordings by mentor Jaz-O, including &quot;The Originators&quot; and &quot;Hawaiian Sophie.&quot; After proving himself in rap battles, Jay-Z rose to greater prominence as the hype man for rap legend Big Daddy Kane. His first official rap single was called &quot;I Can't Get With That,&quot; and it spawned a career so packed with accomplishments (and criminal charges) that a full listing of them would exhaust both readers and writer alike. Let's just say that Jay-Z is a wide and refreshing departure from guys like Michael Eisner.<br />
Besides, Jay-Z's business accomplishments are of greater relevance here. He started Roc-A-Fella Records with Damon Dash and Kareem Biggs in 1996, and built it up into a profitable subsidiary of Universal Music Group. He is the founder of the urban clothing brand Rocawear  (also with Damon Dash), which he sold to Iconix Brand Group, for $204 million, retaining his stake in the company and his role overseeing marketing, licensing, and product development. He is a co-brand director for Budweiser Select, and is part owner of the 40/40 Club, where this writer once attended a party for the second season premiere of Rescue Me and managed to a) get his belt buckle caught in someone's purse and b) have a panic attack within 30 seconds of entering the club. None of this is Jay-Z's fault, however, and is not intended to reflect upon 40/40 or the impressive catering spread therein.<br />
<strong><br />
Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Collaborator. Hip-hop culture values artistic and entrepreneural collaboration, hence Jay-Z's numerous co-foundings and partnerships. His diverse business portfolio qualifies him as a Visionary, too. Jay-Z's a smart guy precisely because he didn't come up in an insulated MBA culture where failure is, to some extent, rewarded. Complacency isn't something you find much of in his career.<br />
<strong><br />
Recommendation(s) for Improvement: </strong>Organizer. Not that Jay-Z is disorganized, but he has a lot of different items on his plate. The busier he gets, and the more he has to manage and delegate, the trickier it becomes to stay on top of everything. Diaphragm circles and meditation (assuming he doesn't meditate already) would be good for him, and taking up sudoku/logic puzzles would keep his troubleshooting skills sharp.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Coaching with FEBI: Is this how I am or how I want to see myself?]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/52-coaching-with-febi-is-this-how-i-am-or-how-i-want-to-see-myself.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=52</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Q: How much do the answers on the FEBI reflect how you want to see yourself vs. how you actually behave and feel? It seems crucial to have conversations with others to test the veracity of the FEBI report.</p>
<p>A: Conversations with others absolutely help to bring the FEBI report to life and tease out its insights.  I usually start a FEBI coaching session by testing the FEBI results against a person's own experience, as well as my experience of their energy.  If either one of us senses a mismatch, that's the first good conversation to have.  All instruments capture some combination of present-moment state and long-term traits, though we find that clear pattern differences are durable when people have taken the FEBI multiple times.  We also know that pattern preferences themselves can influence how we answer questions on an instrument (for example, people strong in Collaborator tend to answer enthusiastically high on many questions and their scores overall are higher).  On top of that, some people are simply more self aware than others. </p>
<p>Having said all that, our research comparing FEBI self scores with 360 data - which are observations from others - show strong correlations that others tend to see our weaknesses in the same pattern as we do.  About 1/3 of the time, areas for development - as seen by others - relate to an overused Home pattern; about 3/4 of the time, developmental areas relate to an underused 4th pattern.  So even though we only answer the FEBI for ourselves, we tend to arrive at answers that are broadly consistent with the views of others. </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Coaching with FEBI - When a different Development Table is needed]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/51-coaching-with-febi---when-a-different-development-table-is-needed.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=51</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Q: What if I, or a person I'm coaching, want to see a development table other than the one in the FEBI report?</p>
<p>A: We include the development table for the weakest pattern - and any low scoring pattern - in the FEBI report, as our research has shown that in more than 3/4's of the cases, the areas for development that others perceive in a person relate to one's 4th pattern.  However, as you say, sometimes it's another pattern that's of greater developmental interest.  For that, you (or your coachee) can use the Move to Greatness book as a resource; at the end of each pattern chapter is a complete development table for that pattern. </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Coaching with FEBI when all patterns are moderate]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/50-coaching-with-febi-when-all-patterns-are-moderate.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=50</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Some great questions have come up in this spring's FEBI certification webinar, and this is a good place to post a few answers. </p>
<p>Q: All of my patterns were moderate and fairly close together.  What are the implications of this vs. when patterns are far apart?</p>
<p>A: It's common for scores to be in the moderate range; the FEBI report is scaled so that about 65% of the scores will fall in this mid-range (note: when we launch FEBI 2.0 later this spring, we'll be re-scaling the patterns so that only the mid 40% will fall in the Moderate range to be more aligned with other instruments, as well as behavioral observations).  Even more important than absolute value, however is <em>pattern order</em> when it comes to predicting characteristic strengths and weaknesses.  When the scores are all close together and in the moderate range, chances are good the person is fairly balanced in accessing the patterns and, if she uses the right pattern at the right time, she's probably seen as balanced and effective by others.  The downside of a balanced profile is that the person may not be as distinctly &quot;branded&quot; as one who is strongly differentiated in the patterns, and others may not know quite what to expect from the person.</p>
<p>Even if scores are close on the overall profile, the page of Work Behaviors in the FEBI report can be very useful for teasing out pattern preferences, since this was a forced choice part of the instrument and not factored into the earlier scoring.  Looking at what patterns dominate in the top half vs. bottom half can substantiate either a good deal of balance (if all colors are in both halves), or more subtle differentiation (if some patterns cluster in the top or bottom).  Looking at the behaviors clustered near the bottom of this chart, a good coaching question is, &quot;Are these things you take for granted, or could you use more of them in your work or life?&quot;   What often surfaces is that even with a relatively balanced profile, if work or life conditions are such that some pattern is especially needed now, a conversation on the Work Behaviors page can tease it out.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/48-carly-fiorina-former-ceo-of-hewlett-packard.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=48</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img align="left" alt="" style="width: 157px; height: 128px;" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/carly.jpg" />Name:</strong> Carly Fiorina<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation:</strong> Former executive vice president at AT&amp;T; former CEO of Hewlett-Packard; current Senate candidate<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights: </strong>Fiorina got a B.A. in philosophy and medieval history from Stanford University, wisely employing the strategy of pursuing two majors so fundamentally useless that they came back around to being essential. Post-Stanford, her schooling was more traditionally business-oriented: an MBA in marketing from the University of Maryland: College Park, then a Master of Science in management from MIT. She tried her hand at a law degree at UCLA, but dropped out after one semester, a humanities graduate to the very end.<br />
She worked her way up the ladder from there, working secretarial and receptionist positions everywhere from Hewlett-Packard to real estate firm Marcus &amp; Millichap. She also taught English in Italy, again putting that humanities major to good use. Fiorina joined AT&amp;T in 1980 as a management trainee and became a senior vice president there, overseeing the company's hardware and systems division. After spearheading Lucent's spinoff from AT&amp;T, she was appointed president of Lucent's consumer products business, and began collecting other, even more convoluted job titles from that day forward until Fortune Magazine rated her as the most powerful woman in business.<br />
Sadly, her performance as Hewlett-Packard's CEO didn't do much for the reputation she'd earned. After controversial decisions to split HP, merge the part she kept with Compaq, attempt an acquisition of computer-services business EDS, and more or less champion tech-job outsourcing, she was forced out after the company's stock price had dropped by half. These days, she's a professional board member and a challenger to Barbara Boxer's Senate seat. Her campaign thus far has notably produced <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo7HiQRM7BA"><strong>the worst political ad of all time</strong></a>, aimed at fellow Republican Tom Campbell. <br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s): </strong>There sure are a lot of Drivers in business, eh? Sheesh. Add Carly Fiorina to that list, along with Organizer. She's good with details and knew how to advance in a business environment where the &quot;glass ceiling&quot; all but had steel reinforcements. Her tenure at AT&amp;T was one of very specific tasks and even more specific (to the point of pedantic) job titles, and she prospered. <br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Visionary. She seems to have trouble conceptualizing, which is odd considering the abstract concepts she studied as a college student. Her HP career and political campaign thus far have shown that she's uncomfortable with the big picture, and gets lost in a non-linear, sandbox business atmosphere. We recommend cracking open some of those old Philosophy textbooks and working on logic problems, then spend some time playing Grand Theft Auto for a more fun, if less mature, angle on open-ended problem solving. The key is to establish a comfort level with thinking around problems when no immediate, rational solutions present themselves. And as always, remember to breathe.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[John Edwards, two-time presidential candidate]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/47-john-edwards-two-time-presidential-candidate.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=47</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><em><img align="left" alt="" style="width: 115px; height: 95px;" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/john edwards tiny.jpg" />Now that the first wave of Snowpocalypse 2010 is over, here's a Profile in Competence of former presidential candidate/current media-pilloried cad John Edwards.</em></p>
<p><strong>Name:</strong> John Edwards<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation:</strong> Former U.S. Senator (NC), two-time presidential candidate, director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />
<strong><br />
Career Highlights:</strong> The son of a mill worker, Edwards was the first person in his family to attend college and, presumably, law school. Made his name as a &quot;plaintiff's lawyer&quot; in medical lawsuits, possibly using his mill working heritage to his advantage in doing so. He turfed Lauch Faircloth out of his Senate seat in 1998, and immediately began considering a run at the presidency, but still took the time to reassure voters that, yes, his father worked in a mill. Ran for president in 2004 and was initially favored due to his looks and charm - indeed, when this writer was in college, he attended a political roundtable discussion where all the participants talked about for upwards of thirty minutes was how handsome and Kennedy-esque John Edwards was. He lost, ultimately, and bided his time with other political work until 2008, when he ran again and lost. It also came out that he fathered an child with a longtime mistress, despite being married to a woman so sympathetic to his political ambitions that she campaigned with him when not undergoing chemotherapy. Nonetheless, it is still true that his father worked in a mill.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Driver and Collaborator. John's combination of charm and ambition is potent to the point of volatile. He knows how to get people to like and feel comfortable with him quickly, a skill essential to swaying juries and campaigning for office. And he's enough of a shark to climb the ladder and profit from these social advantages.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Organizer. John's ambition gets in his way; he's so busy achieving that he has trouble staying focused on more immediate tasks. It's worth considering that he wasn't elected because voters got the sense that, with nothing higher to shoot for than the presidency, he wouldn't know what to do with himself. John has to learn to stick to things, and what better time to learn than the inescapable disgrace of the present? Turn on some Bach and start the morning off with Diaphragm Circles. Reorganize the office. Lay out the desk like a props table and make sure everything has a place. Meditate. Get your life together.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[FEBI 2.0 - Please Help Us]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/46-febi-20---please-help-us.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=46</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Clients, Friends, Colleagues and Acquaintances,</p>
<p>You know our commitment to research around the FEBI and energy patterns, and this year we&rsquo;re excited to launch a two-part study to make the FEBI even stronger and better understand its connection to another instrument, the NEO.</p>
<p>Which one of these 4 requests would get you to join us?</p>
<p><img width="50" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="50" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/DriverGraphic.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/218527/febi-2-0">Click here to take the FEBI 2.0</a>. I bet you don&rsquo;t have what it takes to complete it in less than 15 minutes. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img width="51" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="50" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/OrganizerGraphic.jpg" alt="" />We know we can count on you because you always deliver.  You&rsquo;ll get a data update on the parts and patterns of your personality, and our deep appreciation for your efforts. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img width="50" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="50" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/CollaboratorGraphic.jpg" alt="" />Don&rsquo;t be left out! Join the wave of Focus friends getting their first glimpse of FEBI 2.0.  Your being a part of it makes our collective effort bigger and better. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img width="50" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="50" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/VisionaryGraphic.jpg" alt="" />Human energy essence&hellip;the patterns are transforming they way we think about transforming ourselves, our teams and businesses.  The research we do today will inform generations to come&hellip;Your energy is of the utmost importance.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We hope one of these requests resonated with you and that your next <a href="http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/218527/febi-2-0">click is on this link</a></p>
<p>After we receive your FEBI answers, we&rsquo;ll follow up with your FEBI results and a link to an online NEO survey.  And you really DO have our thanks!</p>
<p>Ginny<br />
 </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/45-angela-merkel-chancellor-of-germany.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=45</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/bush-groping-german-chancellor-angela-merkel.jpg" style="width: 160px; height: 138px;" alt="" /><strong>Name:</strong> Angela Merkel<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation:</strong> Chancellor of Germany; chairwoman of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU); Chairwoman of the CDU-CSU (Christian Social Union)/<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> As a student, Merkel was a member of the Socialist-led youth movement Free German Youth, and was active during her time at the Academy of Sciences. She describes her youth movement years as &quot;cultural work,&quot; which must sound completely insane to American readers who would be pilloried if they ever ran for anything with that on their resume. She also helped reconstruct Moritz Bastei while studying at the University of Leipzig, a student-initiated project that took some coaxing for the university to allow. She studied physics, and got a doctorate for her thesis on quantum chemistry. Merkel got into politics in a typically convoluted European way that we are not even going to attempt explaining, but suffice it to say that she is a big wheel in German politics who gets compared to Margaret Thatcher a lot and has a reputation for being somewhat rock-fisted. But she was lauded for being the first female German chancellor, and the youngest since World War II.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Driver, typical of a politician. As a female politician, it's doubly true for Merkel, who knows how to set and achieve goals for herself. She chaired the G8, for crying out loud. She is also a member of the Council of Women World Leaders, which mobilizes high-level female leaders  for collective action on women's issues. If you ever need a pitchfork jabbed in your butt at some point in your life, Angela Merkel is who you ask.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Collaborator, specifically interpersonal communication. She ran for Chancellor on a platform of economic know-how, yet mixed up gross and net income in a televised debate; her initial meetings with President Obama were awkward because, according to Der Spiegel, &quot;the rather more reserved chancellor couldn't really keep up with [his]...charm offensive&quot;; the list goes on and on. Merkel is not someone who can booze and schmooze, which has a lot to do with the chilly reception she's gotten from the German public at times, even from within her own political party. She needs a few rounds of Lying-Down Blahs every morning to regulate her breathing and release all that nervous tension, and if she doesn't listen to big band music already, she needs to start. Hell, der Palast Orchester are local to her - hire them for a reception or something. Maybe if she's dancing and engaging with people in an activity, she'll lose some of that &quot;Iron Lady&quot; self-restraint and communicate easier.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Sergio Marchionne; CEO of Fiat SpA]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/44-sergio-marchionne-ceo-of-fiat-spa.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=44</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/200px-Sergio_Marchionne.jpg" style="width: 166px; height: 152px;" alt="" />Name:</strong> Sergio Marchionne<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation: </strong>CEO, Fiat SpA; CEO, Chrysler Group; Chairman of ACEA<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> Sergio was born in Chieti, a town in southern Italy, and his family emigrated to Toronto when he was 13, explaining his dual Canadian and Italian citizenship. He went to college at the University of Toronto, earned his Masters in Business Administration (MBA) from the University of Windsor, and his Bachelor of Laws (LLB) came from Osgoode Hall Law School of York University. Serigo is a barrister, solicitor and Certified General Accountant; basically, he has every job that Monty Python has ever mocked. Nevertheless, his resume is impressive, boasting high-ranking postions at Lawson Mardon Group, Glenex Industries, Acklands Ltd., and most recently, CEO of the Fiat Group. Out of respect, we will not divulge what many frustrated car owners think Fiat really stands for (hint: Fix It Again, Tony). Sergio is also the CEO of Chrysler Groups, assuming the position when Chrysler emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy last year and Fiat took a controlling stake in the company.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> <em>Driver</em>; Sergio strikes us as a goal-oriented guy, and his employment history displays him as a professional go-getter. Fiat has also reversed fortunes by actually generating them under his leadership, becoming one of the fastest growing companies in the auto industry. That puts Sergio up there with Lee Iacocca and Carlos Ghosn, two other Drivers who didn't shy away from hard work.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> We don't know much about Sergio's personal life, aside from an appreciation for fast cars (he's on the list for a 500 Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione, and he crashed his Ferrari in Switzerland in 2007), and his biographies concentrate strictly on his professional achievements. But men like him often have a tough time shutting their brains off for a while, so we're going ahead with <em>Collaborator/Visionary</em> exercises for him - he may need a creative outlet that doesn't feed back into his aggression. Plus, he'll need all the good vibes and harmony available to pull Chrysler's carcass out of the tar pit. Floating exercises and meditation would help a lot, and he could add some bouncing exercises in there to exercise his core as well.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos, Lord and Sovereign of Amazon.com]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/43-jeff-bezos-lord-and-sovereign-of-amazoncom.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=43</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img style="width: 155px; height: 140px" height="314" alt="" width="320" align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/bezos_hirez.jpg" />Name:</strong> Jeff Bezos</p>
<p><strong>Occupation:</strong> Founder, president, and CEO of Amazon.com.</p>
<p><strong>Career Highlights:</strong> A scientist since his mamma put him in the crib. No, really; he tried dismantling his crib with a screwdriver when he was a toddler. How he managed to get his hands on one as a baby is a question best left to his parents. Bezos also rigged an electric alarm in his room to keep pesky siblings out, and turned the garage into a laboratory. Lambda Lambda Lambda material all the way. And speaking of college, he entered Princeton University for physics, but switched over to computer science and electrical engineering, graduating summa cum laude. As a young professional, he applied his degree to the financial industry until he started Amazon.com from his garage after a cross-country drive. He's now so insanely wealthy that he can seriously consider human spaceflight, and in fact started Blue Origin with that in mind.</p>
<p><strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Organizer. Bezos' scientific precision is as much as part of his corporate life as it is his creative/inventive one. His degrees in engineering and computer science give him away as a fastidious thinker, but also a patient one, neither of which are a bad thing. The beginnings of Amazon suggest an impulsive Visionary side to him as well.</p>
<p><strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement: </strong>Collaborator, big time. Bezos is &quot;known for his attention to business process details,&quot; which lends itself to Cond&eacute; Nast's more colorful description of him as &quot;a notorious micromanager. ... an executive who wants to know about everything from contract minutiae to how he is quoted in all Amazon press releases.&quot; For a guy who's so good at organizing people, Bezos doesn't seem like he really trusts them to do their jobs. As someone who believes in outsourcing certain processing/administrative tasks from computers to people, he needs to be less of a nag. Art projects, big messy ones that he doesn't assemble piece by piece, would give the other half of his brain a workout. Sculpture would appeal to his tactile nature, in fact. And of course, some core/centering exercises couldn't hurt.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Ed Rendell, PA governor]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/42-ed-rendell-pa-governor.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=42</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><em><img align="left" alt="" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/rendell030708.jpg" style="width: 180px; height: 161px;" />Due to (a) reader demand, here's a profile of current Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell. </em></p>
<p><strong>Name:</strong> Ed Rendell<br />
<strong><br />
Occupation:</strong> former mayor of Philadelphia, current governor of Pennsylvania<br />
<strong><br />
Career Highlights: </strong>Villanova graduate and 2nd Lieutenant in the US Army Reserve. Served two terms as Philadelphia district attorney, initially campaigning as a political outsider who hadn't been around long enough to blacken his soul with corruption. Somehow received 28 delegate votes for Vice President at the 1980 DNC, even though he wasn't running and had gubernatorial ambitions in Pennsylvania. After losing the 1986 governor's race to Bob Casey Sr., Rendell ran for mayor of Philadelphia and won, forever squashing rumors that the office was claimed by whoever could eat the most cheese steaks. Rendell inherited a ton of fiscal problems, but managed to pare them down to a balanced budget and much-improved city services (including, for the first time, sanitation), although his cost-cutting pissed off local unions something fierce. Rendell's stewardship of Philadelphia has often been compared to Rudy Giuliani's effect on New York City.</p>
<p>Rendell ran for governor again in 2002, winning this time, and kicked things off with The Plan for a New Pennsylvania, a piece of legislation that led to a glut of local tax minutia that will bore anyone still reading this to tears. He was criticized for his support of legalized gambling and calling voters &quot;misguided&quot; when they voted against something he liked. He was reelected in 2006, and was an ardent supporter of Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential race, going so far as to compliment Fox News, of all networks, for their objectivity in their coverage of her campaign. Rendell didn't watch CNN much during that period, we take it.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s): </strong>Organizer. Philadelphia, no matter what people may personally think of it now, is a urban utopia compared to what it was when Rendell first stepped in as mayor. Being able to improve so many varied elements of a city that big means that he was able to prioritize and execute (an uncomfortable phrasing, given his support of capital punishment). Every successful politician is a Driver, but Rendell's brain-numbing focus on city and state economic matters sets him apart.<br />
<strong><br />
Recommendation(s) for Improvement: </strong>Collaborator. Many of Rendell's more questionable decisions and statements are reactionary. Insisting that Janet Napolitano was a good pick for Homeland Security secretary because she had no life is but one example; he also withheld funds for the expansion of the Pennsylvania Convention Center over a spat with management appointments, and partially shut down the state government after an argument with the legislature. Taking one's ball and going home is not a ringing endorsement of one's people skills or overall managerial stamina. Some Standing and Lying-Down Blah exercises could help relieve that defensiveness and keep Gov. Rendell from acting like a pissy little kid when people stray from the path he's chosen for them.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[George Meany, first AFL-CIO president]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/41-george-meany-first-afl-cio-president.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=41</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img width="142" height="167" align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/Meany.jpg" alt="" />To mark the upcoming occasion of AFL-CIO Day (Dec. 5th), here's a write-up on the organization's first president, George Meany.</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Name</strong>: George Meany<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation: </strong>First president of the AFL-CIO, from 1955-1979.<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> A humble New York plumber who got into the labor movement instead of rescuing princesses named after fruit from weird spiky turtles. Assumed presidency of the New York State Federation of Labor and served until 1939. Also served on the National Labor Relations Board during World War II. Went on to lead the AFL-CIO in 1955, where he purged &quot;leftist&quot; unions from the fold as a sternly anti-communist believer in the cooperation of labor and capital. Worked closely with Jay Lovestone's Free Trade Union Committee to organize unions overseas - unfortunately, this meant helping Latin American dictators oppress the same workers Meany otherwise spent his life trying to help. I guess having the last name &quot;Meany&quot; requires living up to it at some point in one's life.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Driver and Organizer. A career in the labor movement wouldn't amount to much without the latter option. Meany managed to merge the AFL and the CIO towards the goal of higher living standards for working people, which requires both the ability to get people to work together and the tenacity to make sure they get things done. <br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Collaborator, big time. Meany's pit boss instincts often left minorities, consumers, and workers in non-organized urban areas out in the cold. He also chased a lot of unions that didn't fall into line with his politics out of the AFL-CIO; Walter Reuther yanked the UAW out after years of friction between himself and Meany, and they didn't rejoin until after both men had died. Meany's stubbornly conservative views are a mark of the times he lived in, though, and it's weird to recommend Pattern Strengthening exercises to a dead guy who was reacting to very specific circumstances while he was alive. Still, if any frowny post-war leftovers are reading this, listen to some Eddie Vinson records and try the Sitting Bounce. It'll help your people skills and, considering how old you probably are, your digestion as well.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Michael Eisner, former Disney CEO]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/40-michael-eisner-former-disney-ceo.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=40</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img width="158" height="169" align="left" alt="" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/Eisner.jpg" />Name:</strong> Michael Eisner<br />
<strong><br />
Occupation:</strong> former Disney CEO, founder of The Tornante Company (a private investment firm), holds stakes in Veoh Networks and Vuguru.<br />
<strong><br />
Career Highlights:</strong> Graduated from Denison University with a B.A. in English, thereby providing at least one credible answer to the opening song from Avenue Q. Bounced around the networks until ABC's Barry Diller hired him as an assistant to the National Programming Director. When Diller moved on to Paramount Studios, he brought Eisner along and made him their CEO. Beverly Hills Cop was released during this time; that he was in any way responsible for that blows my mind. Eisner moved over to the then-floundering Walt Disney Company in 1984, and the company revitalized with a string of formulaic musical cartoon features that may or may not be festooned with hidden dirty parts (although the cover art for The Little Mermaid is pretty blatant).  Disney also absorbed Miramax Films, ABC, and ESPN during this time, and expanded their theme park dynasty with a strong portfolio of unworkable proposals (the Roger Rabbit franchise) and a couple of ideas that took forever to turn a profit (Disneyland Paris). He lost favor with Disney after railroading a friend of his past the board of directors to replace Frank Wells as President, and Roy E. Disney accused him of micromanagement and turning the company into a &quot;rapacious, soul-less&quot; brand.<br />
<strong><br />
Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Driver and Organizer. It's not a coincidence that two separate companies started churning out hits once Eisner took the helm - the guy knows how to get people moving. He's also been cagey and opportunistic enough to never be out of work long, suggesting typical Driver energy patterns. And god bless them - his bills come every month, too. His ideas for Disney's expansion suggest some of that old Visionary magic too, but that one isn't really dominant.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> But it could be! Some Visionary and Collaborator exercises could curb some of Eisner's lone wolf tendencies, and keep him from becoming the old guy in Big who thinks robots should turn into buildings. For the Visionary end of things, we suggest Floating Hands exercises along with liberal doses of Frank Zappa's &quot;The Grand Wazoo&quot; album. The Collaborator center is in the belly, so the Sitting Bounce (sitting in half-lotus and shaking your foot, allowing the rest of your body to jiggle) and Loosening Relief exercises should be helpful there.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Elon Musk, Tesla Motors CEO]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/39-elon-musk-tesla-motors-ceo.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=39</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img align="left" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/elon_musk.jpg" style="width: 182px; height: 167px;" alt="" />Name:</strong> Elon Musk. No, really.<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation: </strong>CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors; Chairman of SolarCity<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> After wisely observing that oppressing black people as part of the South African military &quot;just didn't seem like a really good way to spend time,&quot; Musk emigrated to Canada, enrolling at Queen's College, then studied at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School - he left with undergraduate degrees in economics and physics. It's safe to say he recovered nicely from being named &quot;Elon Musk.&quot; Went to grad school at Stanford for a cup of coffee, then dropped out to start Zip2 with his brother Kimbal. Went on to found X.com and co-found Paypal, the sales of which made him quite wealthy. Now spends his time running companies that make space launch vehicles and electric cars, so pretty much everyone younger than 13 reveres him as a living god for having such awesome jobs.<br />
<strong><br />
Dominant Pattern(s): </strong>Visionary; Elon's pretty good at establishing companies built around developing concepts/technologies, and perhaps even better at knowing how to profit from them. He's also not as much of a hyper-aggressive Driver as our other profiles thus far; after discovering which one of his employees leaked Tesla's then-delicate financial situation to the press, Elon allowed him the option of apologizing to the company and resigning, rather than pressing charges against him. Had it been Vince McMahon at the helm, that employee would have been fed to sharks live on pay-per-view.<br />
<br />
<strong>Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> This guy needs an Organizer tune-up. As good at Elon is at big ideas, he hasn't shown us much follow-through, considering the alpha position he's held within his various companies. People buy his ideas based on their potential, for the most part, and not their bottom-line performance (aside from Paypal). He's also quite paranoid and resorted to entrapment schemes to keep other Tesla Motors secrets from leaking. Elon's able brain clearly needs a little structure - a couple of posture exercises will do nicely. Exercising the pivot point where the ribs meet with stretching and diaphragm circles will do him a world of good, as will a course of Bach fugues.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[What Differentiates FEBI?]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/38-what-differentiates-febi.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=38</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Near the end of our FEBI certification webinar yesterday, I was asked how I would &ndash; in a 30 sec pitch to a client - differentiate the FEBI from other assessments. What are 3-4 key talking points? Great question! Here&rsquo;s my answer:</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">1-<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">       </span></span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Connects Being with Doing</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Creates an immersion experience where leaders feel on the inside how they need to be to authentically behave in a certain way or create a certain climate or performance around them; FEBI can then be linked to all other course content</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">2-<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">       </span></span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Is both Descriptive and Prescriptive</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Many assessments give insight into personality, but only the FEBI prescribes specific, mind-body practices to enable and support desired shifts</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">3-<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">       </span></span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Scales from Individual to Groups</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Gives insight into individual personality, as well as how these same patterns emerge in relationships, on teams, in organizations, and across demographic, professional, and national cultures. In all cases, leaders learn levers for bringing out more of a needed energy pattern, and can tie that back into themselves, and how they need to be</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">4-<span style="font: 7pt 'Times New Roman'">       </span></span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Accelerates Development</span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 40px"><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Study after study has shown that mind-body awareness accelerates awareness and development in general; the FEBI makes this crucial link</span></p>
<p> </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[first experience with a team]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/37-first-experience-with-a-team.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=37</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US">Loeke Richter, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. <br />
Just starting to use FEBI in my professional life, I like to share the wonderful experience I had with a 3-woman pilot group. One of the goals of my assignment is to make them- forced to work together due to reorganization- a team, inside/outside. Their manager&lsquo;s biggest worry is that that don&rsquo;t show a strong coming out as a team. I only have 4 sessions with the team and in the second one we went through the FEBI-reports. <br />
After explaining and showing the basic elements of the 4 patterns, I asked them to react on their individual FEBI-reports, before giving the results of the group roll out.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>At that time, they didn&rsquo;t know that they all had the driver&rsquo;s pattern as their weakest. They made a drawing of the pattern they wanted to work on most, all about the driver and then told each other their favorite sports and hobby&rsquo;s, completely <span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>the opposite of the driver.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Until that time they didn&rsquo;t know a thing about<br />
each others live and suspiciously regarded the other as being too much a driver&hellip; It was wonderful<br />
to see them opening up, being amazed and flabbergasted about the one thing they have in common: <br />
too little driver to stand up and come out. In short time there was lots of laughter, supporting ideas,<br />
energy and fun. <br />
The group roll out didn&rsquo;t surprise them: strong visionary and collaborator, backing<br />
up with organizer and if really necessary, driver.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  </span>Within 3 hours they got to know each other and got committed with brilliant ideas and targets. <br />
For me as a coach, the main thing I had to do is showing them that they were really hard in keeping on track and focus. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Which was received with lots introspective humor. Tired but filled with good energy we ended up.</span></p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Suze Orman, Financial Guru]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/36-suze-orman-financial-guru.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=36</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><img height="116" align="left" width="120" src="http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/userfiles/image/Suze.jpg" alt="" />Name:</strong> Susan &quot;Suze&quot; Orman<br />
<br />
<strong>Occupation:</strong> Author, fundraiser, financial advisor, and host of CNBC's The Suze Orman Show.<br />
<br />
<strong>Career Highlights:</strong> Went from living in a van for three months to waitressing at Berkeley, CA's Buttercup Bakery to training as an account executive at Merrill Lynch, who she later sued when her stockbroker turned out to be a crook. Worked at Merrill Lynch until 1983, then moved over to Prudential, then started her own financial planning firm that she only resigned from because her financial advice books were selling so well. Currently the most successful fundraiser in the history of public television, and reaching that plateau on QVC as well. Evidently, living in a van really prepared her for soliciting money from total strangers.<br />
<br />
<strong>Dominant Pattern(s):</strong> Driver and Collaborator - Suze's initiative shows itself in her rise from absolute poverty to where she is now, and is even more evident in her borderline-terrifying personal intensity. She's also proven to be very good at working with people, to judge from her track record of successful business partnerships, including her current ones with Oprah Winfrey and CostCo. Business opportunities like those don't open up for just anyone, after all. Her casual speaking/writing style and phenomenal book sales suggest not only the ability to delegate, but the ability to reach and energize people, or at least the ability to scare people into feeling reached and energized.<br />
<strong><br />
Recommendation(s) for Improvement:</strong> Switching to decaf, for starters. Also, Suze needs a Visionary tune-up. The criticism that her advice is very general and wades into pop-psychology is well taken, and dumbing things down for the assumed benefit of a mainstream audience is bad news for a topic as achingly complex as personal finance. She should keep up with changing economic landscapes by embracing more creative approaches to help people invest their money. Visionary exercises would help her writing, too - she's not hurting for book sales now, but she will be if future books start repeating themselves. She should try the Floating/Kite movement exercises and read Vonnegut's <em>Breakfast of Champions</em> to flare up a different set of neurons.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Vince McMahon, Chairman of World Wrestling Entertainment]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/33-vince-mcmahon-chairman-of-world-wrestling-entertainment.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=33</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt">Name:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt"> Vincent Kennedy McMahon</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt">Occupation:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt"> Chairman of World Wrestling Entertainment.</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt">Career Highlights:</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt"> Ushered in the modern era of professional wrestling with a nationally televised promotion, as well as licensing/merchandising deals for his talent. Turned a once-risky Wrestlemania venture into a yearly spectacle on par with the Super Bowl. Set box office and PPV records as the hated enemy of Stone Cold Steve Austin. Had someone polish his buttocks with a shoe buffer to advance a televised storyline.</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt">Dominant Pattern(s):</span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt"> Driver. Both former and current WWE employees paint Vince as a confrontational workaholic whose entire life is dedicated to his company (and rightfully so; everything he's tried to do outside of wrestling has been a crashing failure). Every storyline/character decision made by his creative team goes through him, which can result in awkward miscalculations of what the audience likes vs. what Vince thinks is funny. On the other hand, that intense, goal-oriented focus is what helped him navigate the sleazy, disreputable wrestling business; WWE is now a publicly-traded company that has branched out into music and film production.</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><span style="font-size: 10pt">Vince could also be called a Visionary for his idea of what wrestling could become, and his willingness to risk his financial well-being early on to make that happen. He saw potential in a nationally touring company with national television exposure and merchandised talent early enough to establish the then-WWF's market presence well before any of his competitors caught on. Given that, it's easy to forgive the fact that all of his company's cultural references are five years late.</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><b> </b></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; line-height: normal"><b><span style="font-size: 10pt">Recommendation(s) for Improvement: </span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt">Engage that Collaborator center, and fast. Vince already has a writing team under intense pressure to produce, and wrestling stars putting their bodies on the line for a similar purpose, but has trouble delegating to the point where he can remove himself as the content filter before ideas make it to TV. Some of that innate sense of fun he shows as an on-screen character needs to work its way into his leadership approach. Daily rounds of breathing and sitting bounce exercises should get Mr. McMahon swaying and rolling with the (sometimes literal) punches.</span></div>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Bill Gates, former CEO of Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/34-bill-gates-former-ceo-of-microsoft.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=34</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b>Name: </b>Bill Gates</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b>Occupation: </b>Former chief executive officer of Microsoft (currently a part-time non-executive chairman), current co-chair of the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b>Career Highlights: </b>Turned a gift for writing programming code into an operating system that revolutionized computing and had a great deal to do with the rise of personal computers in the United States. Built Microsoft into a global empire fully deserving of the term, designing their products for non-technical consumers. Managed to guide his company through anti-trust lawsuits, industry criticism, and clunkers like Microsoft Bob. Amassed nearly incalculable levels of personal wealth, to the point of becoming a &quot;centibillionaire&quot; for a brief period of time. Is now a dedicated philanthropist.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b>Dominant Pattern(s): </b>Driver, which shouldn't surprise anyone considering Microsoft's market dominance. In fact, he was responsible for the company's product strategy during most of their expansion. Unfortunately, he was as temperamental as his pet operating system, berating Microsoft's senior managers and program managers during meetings with them; jabs like &quot;that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard!&quot; and &quot;why don't you just give up your options and join the Peace Corps?&quot; were commonplace during meetings. He has since left Microsoft to focus on his philanthropy, but he remains a very defensive guy, if his response to criticism of the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation is any indication.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"> </div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b>Recommendation(s) for Improvement: </b>Collaborator exercises, and pronto. Bill has shown that he can delegate (however combatively), but like Vince McMahon, he needs to learn how to calm down and take things more in stride. Unlike Vince, Bill doesn't have a public record of goofball antics to build from. It might also behoove Bill to keep his Visionary mojo flowing with peripheral vision and breathing exercises. Not to say that Bill isn't an inventive and curious person - he is - but keeping his approach open and expanded will help him in this new stage of his career and make him easier to be around, as well.</div>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Where Focus Goes...]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/32-where-focus-goes.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=32</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">I chanced by a television program my husband was watching just as Weldon Long was describing his comeback from prison, poverty and addiction in the Upside of Fear. What a story! His deceptively simple, authentically lived, acronymically-clever formula &ndash; F.E.A.R. &ndash; reminded me of truths we&rsquo;ve known and taught in leadership programs for years, starting with F: Focus on what you want, not on the fear of what you don&rsquo;t want. Sometimes called the &ldquo;Law of Attraction,&rdquo; his own experience showed him that when he focused on what he wanted to create, life had an uncanny way of supporting him. Conversely, when he focused on his fears - the fear of losing his son, for example &ndash; in a perverse way, he brought it about by landing himself in prison. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Likewise, anyone in martial arts or competitive sports has seen this truth operate. When you step into a situation afraid of getting hurt, you get hurt. If you&rsquo;re afraid of losing, you lose. If you&rsquo;re afraid you&rsquo;ll make a mistake, you make a mistake. Any concern for yourself whatsoever automatically misaligns your intention, and weakens your performance. &ldquo;Don&rsquo;t let your mind stop,&rdquo; advised the great sword master, Takuan Soho. For there becomes your sticking point.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">This same principle operates in leadership. Not long ago, I worked with a wonderful, high-potential leader who, somehow, had been twice-passed over for a coveted promotion to VP. When he came to the program in which I was his coach, never mind all of his stellar feedback, all he cared about was why wasn&rsquo;t he getting promoted? He already had a coach who had been giving him pointers to try this or that, but nothing seemed to be working. </span>  </p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">&ldquo;You have to let it go,&rdquo; I told him. &ldquo;If you&rsquo;re stuck in that question, somehow you&rsquo;re going to get other people stuck in that question. Forget about it. Focus on what you want to create.&rdquo; Of course it wasn&rsquo;t quite that simple. He had to dig into why he was holding that promotion question so tightly, and recognize the lurking self doubt (which, subliminally, is what others sense and what fuels their doubt in us, too), as well as the dollop of self worth he thought would come &ndash; at last! &ndash; with a promotion. But once he saw it, even he had to laugh at the absurdity of it, because he knew this pattern well; it had been with him his entire life. As if one more piece of evidence would </span><span style="font-size: 10pt">finally settle the case of whether he had achieved enough! I could feel him set down this old baggage as the week went on, and leave the program less entangled. I didn&rsquo;t know what he would do with it or if it would last.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">Until last week. He dropped me a note to say, &rdquo;I wanted to thank you again for your coaching and insight. I think about them often and they have helped me significantly.&rdquo; And he was happy to report that he got his promotion after all.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Focusing on what we want to create naturally brings our energy into the world, leading from inside out, as Kevin Cashman would say. Focusing on our self or our fears goes in the opposite direction, outside in, with worry over whether the outside world will accord what we want &ldquo;in here.&rdquo; Inside out allows our authentic, creative expression. Outside in, and we&rsquo;re coping with a crapshoot. Moreover, the mind gets stuck in the exact place where it is least useful &ndash; on itself! </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Once you&rsquo;ve got the right focus, for those of you dying to know the rest of the acronym, Weldon&rsquo;s formula is as good as any:</span><br />
- <span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">E: create an <b>E</b>motional connection to your focus by writing it down.</span> <br />
- <span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">A: <b>A</b>ct in accordance with what you want to create.</span> <br />
- <span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">R: take <b>R</b>esponsibility for your responses to the conditions around you.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Even though I&rsquo;ve known this stuff for ages, as I imagine you have, too, I&rsquo;m reminded anew of the power of focus and our non-delegable role in the Law of Attraction. &ldquo;Where focus goes, energy flows,&rdquo; Tony Robbins quips. So, what are you focused on now?   </span></p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Behind the Financial Meltdown - and equipping leaders to avoid the next one]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/31-behind-the-financial-meltdown---and-equipping-leaders-to-avoid-the-next-one.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=31</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Just reconnected this week with a former client - a seasoned CFO who had been around the financial world as </span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">AIG</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt"> was falling apart and </span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Wall St.</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt"> was in meltdown. I was curious to get his impressions of the role in leadership in all that mess &ndash; was it a failure in leadership? And, if so, what could we be doing as leadership development professionals to better equip leaders to avoid such pitfalls? </span></p>
<p>&quot;<span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">Absolutely a failure of leadership!&rdquo; my colleague declared. &ldquo;It was a case of senior leaders hearing what they wanted to hear,&rdquo; (e.g., a chance for big revenues) &ldquo;and not hearing what they didn&rsquo;t want to hear&rdquo; (e.g., the weakness of their risk models, the lack of external reviews, the warnings from internal reviews). Classic Driver-style leadership, I observed, which runs the risk of single-point focus, impatience, arrogance and, above all, not listening. If this style dominates for long in a company, it gets reinforced structurally, where only a small subset of &ldquo;loyalists&rdquo; get access to the top, and only a trickle of important information gets through. And yet, it&rsquo;s something of a paradox, in that the non-wishy-washy clarity and determination of the Driver are often exactly what select these alpha leaders for the top jobs. Leadership guru, Marshall Goldsmith advises leaders who would move to the top: &quot;what got you here won't get you there.&quot;  The corollary I took from this conversation as it applies to the insulated Uber-Drivers at the top is: &quot;what got you here won't keep you here.&quot;  These leaders are setting themselves and their companies up for failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt">So what can those of us in leadership development do to help? Well, it's a bit of a catch-22, in that the leaders who are most at risk are those who are most arrogant, insulated, and unaware &ndash; unlikely to be the learning-oriented leader who soaks up a leadership program or seeks an executive coach. Of the companies and leaders we can reach, it seems to me we could help by showing the consequences of structural insulation and not listening in, say, a simulation where they demolish their simulated company and then have a chance to try again with greater openness. It seems another tack would be to cultivate more adept influencers with the ability to put their message in a way that even Driver bosses see the &ldquo;win&rdquo; in hearing. The energy patterns can help in programs and coaching by highlighting the problem and a way to move out of it &ndash; both individually and in a corporate culture &ndash; by cultivating the listening skills of the Organizer, the influencing capacity of the Collaborator, and the openness of the Visionary. We know that Drive(r) without recovery and balance in the other patterns leads to burnout for the individual leader. Judging from the observations of this savvy insider, it&rsquo;s also behind a great deal of corporate meltdown.  </span></p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Best Advice Article]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/29-best-advice-article.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=29</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%">There was a great article in the most recent issue of Fortune magazine that I found interesting. The article was called &ldquo;The Best Advice I Ever Got&rdquo; and consisted of a list of leaders talking about just that. The one quote that I&rsquo;d like to share is from Eric Schmidt, chairman and CEO of Google.</div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><i>Hire a coach.</i></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><i><span style="color: black">The advice that sticks out I got from John Doerr, who in 2001 said, &quot;My advice to you is to have a coach.&quot; The coach he said I should have is </span></i><i><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/21/technology/reingold_coach.fortune/index.htm"><span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none">Bill Campbell</span></a><span style="color: black">. I initially resented the advice, because after all, I was a CEO. I was pretty experienced. Why would I need a coach? Am I doing something wrong? My argument was, How could a coach advise me if I'm the best person in the world at this? But that's not what a coach does. The coach doesn't have to play the sport as well as you do. They have to watch you and get you to be your best. In the business context a coach is not a repetitious coach. A coach is somebody who looks at something with another set of eyes, describes it to you in [his] words, and discusses how to approach the problem.<br />
<br />
Once I realized I could trust him and that he could help me with perspective, I decided this was a great idea. When there is [a] business conflict you tend to get rat-holed into it. [Bill's] general advice has been to rise one step higher, above the person on the other side of the table, and to take the long view. He'll say, &quot;You're letting it bother you. Don't.&quot;</span></i></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><span style="color: black">To read on all 22 pieces of best advice starting with Tiger Woods go to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0906/gallery.best_advice_i_ever_got2.fortune/index.html">http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/fortune/0906/gallery.best_advice_i_ever_got2.fortune/index.html</a></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><span style="color: black">I like the quote from Schmidt for several reasons. First and foremost, it is always nice to hear someone with a loud voice promote the coaching field. Many development professionals are struggling in their business as the game has changed. What this article points out is that now is a time that leaders are searching for advice and guidance to ensure that they are doing everything they can to move their business forward. A coach is just the guide to facilitate growth [especially those coaches with the FEBI in their tool box :-</span><span style="color: black">)]. </span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><span style="color: black">The other reason I like this quote is from the second paragraph. This tendency to &ldquo;get rat-holed&rdquo; is certainly something I can relate to. It is easy to get small when faced with a worrisome problem. Unfortunately by doing so you&rsquo;re not helping yourself deal with that problem. Rather than getting small where your sight is limited, the focus must be staying big where you&rsquo;re in a better position to generate solutions. In this way Schmidt&rsquo;s coach helped him in rising one step higher and taking the long view. </span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><span style="color: black">Best advice indeed. I&rsquo;ve already scribbled the last sentence on my dry-erase board above my desk&hellip;&rdquo;You&rsquo;re letting it bother you. Don&rsquo;t&rdquo;.</span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: 150%"><span style="color: black">-Anthony</span></div>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Hurry Up and Slow Down!]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/27-hurry-up-and-slow-down.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=27</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever told you that you need to relax and have more fun? That&rsquo;s what people were saying to a client of mine on a very regular basis. The thing is, they were right! As we were going over her FEBI results it was pretty clear that she was all Driver, all the time. &ldquo;If I can&rsquo;t be the best at something, why bother doing it?&rdquo; she said. The problem she was that she always managed to find someone better than herself and when she did, she thought of herself as a failure. When she hit this mental hurdle she either quit or pushed harder. The end result of this strategy was a young woman who was not only stressed out but physically ill.</p>
<p>It was clear we needed to work on her lowest pattern, Collaborator. We began brainstorming around this and came to the conclusion that she needed to reclaim the fun in her life. When I asked her what she likes to do for fun she literally could not give me an answer. She could not think of one thing that she would enjoy doing. Wow! If that isn&rsquo;t a red flag I don&rsquo;t know what is. Our coaching sessions now focus on managing stress, preventing burnout and reclaiming happiness in her life.</p>
<p>I can certainly empathize with her situation as this Organizer/Driver has a tendency to put fun and relaxation on the sideline in order to keep pushing. Sound familiar?? I write about this case as a reminder to all those low collaborators to make sure to recharge those batteries or when it&rsquo;s time to put the foot on the accelerator they&rsquo;ll be no fuel in the tank.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Working with the Patterns]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/26-working-with-the-patterns.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=26</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>I&rsquo;ve been using the FEBI with great success with a wonderful executive in a leading software company. She has been an athlete most of her life and immediately resonated with an approach that engages her body as well as her mind. Since she is a fencer, I need not tell you what her home pattern is. The other  day we were discussing what her 2 or 3 year old son might prefer (and embody) so she showed me a video of the two of them playing. She would give him lots of colored blocks to play with and he would arrange them in rows or piles, always strictly by color. Mom was surprised that she hadn&rsquo;t instinctively noticed what a little Organizer she had on her hands.</p>
<p>The two of them are now committed to playing loose, improvisational, truly <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1237768862_2">funny games</span> &ndash; at least trying to do so as of this week&hellip;</p>
<p>Agnes Mura</p>
<p> </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[What Do You Make of a FEBI with Very High Everything?]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/25-what-do-you-make-of-a-febi-with-very-high-everything.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=25</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>A colleague recently asked me about a FEBI report for one of her clients &ndash; we&rsquo;ll call him Richard &ndash; that puzzled her because every pattern on the overall energy profile registered &ldquo;Very High&rdquo; &ndash; virtually pegging the meter. &ldquo;How could this be?&rdquo; she asked. &ldquo;And how do I debrief it?&rdquo;</p>
<p>While this may seem like a non-result, it&rsquo;s actually quite revealing, and there&rsquo;s much to learn from it. But let me start by saying it&rsquo;s a good example of why we don&rsquo;t recommend using the FEBI for job selection! Now it&rsquo;s fine for career counseling when somebody sincerely wants to figure out where their strengths lie. But we don&rsquo;t try to make the instrument hard to fake. We encourage people to answer honestly and tease out their preferences by how much they indicate that they &ldquo;almost always&rdquo; do something vs. &ldquo;often&rdquo; do it and so on. If someone takes the FEBI and almost always answers &ldquo;almost always&rdquo;, as Richard did, he or she will score Very High on all of the patterns. Only the Work Behavior part of the instrument forces one to make choices, and there, preferences often make themselves clear, as they did for Richard. But the overall part of the instrument, consistent with 5-factor-type instruments such as the NEO or Hogan suite, assesses each pattern (factor) individually. So yes, one can score &ldquo;Very High&rdquo; on all of them.</p>
<p>Now what does it mean? Well, clearly it&rsquo;s a big, high energy profile. Our early research comparing self-reported FEBI results with impressions from others in 360 data show that people with such a high energy profile (where all patterns score &gt;100) are more likely to be seen by others as highly effective leaders. So if Richard is, in fact, almost always using the right pattern at the right time, his life should look pretty darn good, and it would be obvious when coaching him. Other people should perceive him as a powerful, lively and engaging leader. What I recommend to people like that is keep going! - now with added pattern awareness.</p>
<p>There are other possibilities, likely closer to the truth. In the Work Behavior part of the FEBI, Richard had rated all of the Collaborator behaviors in the top half, along with nearly all of the Visionary behaviors. Organizer behaviors were rock-bottom. Now sometimes even people with an Organizer Home pattern will take their Organizer strengths so much for granted (or delegate these tasks) that these behaviors still show up at the bottom. Was Richard a needing-to-be-perfect Organizer trying to be all things to all people? Or a dramatic, Collaborator Visionary answering everything from a place of abundance? We can&rsquo;t be certain just from the data, but we can easily test out both possibilities as a coach. &ldquo;Do you feel like you have to get it right?&rdquo; I might ask to test out (or rule out) the first possibility. &ldquo;Do you carry a lot of responsibility?&rdquo; Or I might just feel for the held presence and rigidity of someone who is truly a Very High Organizer. Because that person will feel nothing like a Very High Collaborator, who will be talking most of the time, telling stories, gesturing dramatically, and probably moving around. Far more likely that Richard is the dramatic, Collaborator Visionary who answered the FEBI in a characteristically BIG way. If this is the case, his life should look large, but cluttered, with a pattern of grand ideas that die on the vine. My coaching recommendation would be help Richard bring in enough Driver to cut through the excess and enough Organizer to nail down the most important. But make it fun and dramatic every step of the way!</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Artistic Leadership]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/23-artistic-leadership.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=23</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 9pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt"><span style="font-size: 9pt">I am successfully incorporating and experimenting with the FEBI Leadership quadrants with  Anne Green Gilbert's BrainDance patterns by ensuring that through the 8 movement patterns of the BrainDance, I incorporate the driver movements of thrust, the organizer movements of shape, the visionary movements of hang, and the collaborator movements of swing, from Betsy Wetzig's research and processes that were shared with Ginny. </span>   <span style="font-size: 9pt">The anecdotal results are positive over a two-three day follow-up, while attending conferences with session participants. Examples include comments from participants that demonstrate them going to a bookstore to purchase books that I've recommended, doing portions of the BrainDance in their hotel rooms, with peers, and significant others, or alone, before seeing me the next day, asking for the list of 8 movements of the BrainDance, asking for extra hand-outs, sharing what they did after my session to review/incorporate/share the session contents with others/self, positive evaluations regarding my session, promises to ensure that MORE ARTS will happen for students and teachers in their districts, and invitations to come and present  the information/experiences in their districts/regions.</span>   <span style="font-size: 9pt">My hope is to enhance the lives of those who work with me in this process, and to encourage moving to greatness with intention and possibility.</span>       </span></span></p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[FEBI Video: Patterns on the Small Screen]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/21-febi-video-patterns-on-the-small-screen.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=21</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Below is a link to a video my wife and I created in an attempt to illustrate what is possible with this instrument. It won&rsquo;t be a shock to anyone that watches the video that I grew up on comics books (never grew out of it either!). After some glue, scissors, construction paper, several hundred still photos and some very useful editing software, this is what we came up with. Hope you enjoy watching it as much as we did making it. Sorry for the resolution, you tube only lets you up load low-resolution videos. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sQfxhW3zFM">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sQfxhW3zFM</a> Your editor, Anthony Attan</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[You're Fired! ...and how to get to 'thank you']]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/20-youre-fired-and-how-to-get-to-thank-you.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=20</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>I was recently given the opportunity to work with a client on a sudden and unexpected career change (sound familiar anyone?).  She emailed me moments after receiving notice that she would be laid off and, at that moment, was working on just breathing &ndash; nice strategy. For months she had been telling me how much she couldn&rsquo;t stomach the climate she was working in and how she wanted to get out and do some independent consulting or something different. Apparently unwilling to make the transition herself, she was now in the place where the universe had decided for her.</p>
<p><strong>Disaster or Opportunity?</strong></p>
<p>When we met that evening, it was clear she was doing her best to hold it together; however her stress was bubbling from the inside-out.  Her voice quaked with worry and the tension in her body was apparent, though she was clearly attempting to look calm and poised, caught, as she was, in the anxious grip of the Organizer.  Her presentation would come as no surprise, knowing that Organizer is her Home pattern.  But it didn&rsquo;t have to be working against her.  It is, after all, a useful pattern in crisis and the best place to start in sorting things out.</p>
<p>So&hellip;we talked a little about her current reality &ndash; savings, cash flow needs, low lying fruit/ opportunities for immediate transition, basic skills and network &ndash; so we could get grounded in what&rsquo;s needed and what&rsquo;s available in the present. It became clear that she had a few months to make this transition, though regrettably she&rsquo;d have to dig into savings.  Hey! Savings are meant for rainy days &ndash; and this was a time for her when it was certainly raining! </p>
<p>We then talked about the choices she had in perceiving the situation, knowing that how she defined it would determine its reality (for her) and her approach (in response to it).  We tossed around three options, which I might roughly characterize as follows: </p>
<p>Option 1: &ldquo;Oh My God! This is a disaster&hellip;I need cash now&hellip;and I&rsquo;m willing to do anything short of taking my clothes off to get it.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Option 2: &ldquo;Okay, I just give up and I&rsquo;m going to sell all my possessions and move to Nepal.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Option 3: &ldquo;Thank God! This is the opportunity I&rsquo;ve been waiting for, and I should send a thank you note to my former employer for kicking my butt out the door because it&rsquo;s forcing me to find the perfect career move, which I wouldn&rsquo;t have done on my own!&rdquo;  <br />
I&rsquo;m sure there are other options, but among these, I&rsquo;d go with option # 3 &ndash; how &lsquo;bout you? </p>
<p><strong>A Pattern Approach to Transitions</strong></p>
<p>Now, it came out in our review of low-lying fruit that two job opportunities had floated across her inbox in just the past few hours (she was completely apathetic about one, and the other brightened her eyes a bit &ndash; either would pay the mortgage). It was also clear that these opportunities were NOT something she&rsquo;d normally consider if the layoff hadn&rsquo;t pushed her out the door.  So we developed a transition plan based on the patterns&hellip;and the order of the patterns is important!  Here is an outline of her plan and please use this as a basis of consideration / launching pad in developing your own:</p>
<p><br />
  1.	First, take a DEFINED number of days &ndash; five-to-seven days seems ample and appropriate for your circumstances &ndash; to completely enter the <strong>VISIONARY</strong>: visiting places of wide open space and natural beauty (museums, the ocean, personal spaces of reflection and deep connection) and simply sitting with the present moment, giving yourself permission to do nothing. On some occasions, bring a pad of paper and pen and jot down ideas that come to you as you throw in questions like these: </p>
<ul>
    <li>What does the world need right now and what can I contribute to fulfilling that need? </li>
    <li>What wants to happen in my life and what is my life telling me about the direction of my career?</li>
    <li>When I&rsquo;m done with my career what do I want to have contributed, what do I want to leave behind?</li>
    <li>What is my most powerful reason &ndash; my WHY? That thing/value/belief which propels my decisions and actions?  Is the WHY of my past still relevant going forward? </li>
    <li>What is shifting for me? What aspects of Who I Am want to be expressed through my life now?  <br />
     </li>
</ul>
<p><u>Using <strong>COLLABORATOR </strong>in the Visionary Stage</u>: Engage your Collaborator energy in this initial phase to do some fishing &ndash; put out as many lines of communication as possible to broaden your options, and resist the temptation to real in the first fish that bites! You might have drinks and dinner with your contacts but no official interviews! (Schedule those for AFTER this phase) Keep all lines of communication open, friendly and social. Ask questions that keep exploring who can help: </p>
<ul>
    <li>When I&rsquo;m in &ldquo;xyz&rdquo; town, who could I call up and go to dinner with?</li>
    <li>Who have I been too busy to visit lately and would visiting them now be worthwhile?</li>
    <li>Who else have I been out of touch with that I&rsquo;d be interested in reconnecting with?</li>
</ul>
<p><br />
2.	Next, take your best idea(s) that emerge from Visionary reflection (look at your pad of ideas) and make a DECISION &ndash; call upon the single point focus of the <strong>DRIVER</strong> - and put it in writing, make it real, state your commitment. Harness the Driver&rsquo;s clarity to move from reflection into the world of ACTION!  Here&rsquo;s how&hellip;Ask yourself these questions: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Of all the things I could do, what MUST I do right now? What&rsquo;s most important?</li>
    <li>Among my talents and skills, which one or two are going to help me WIN now? </li>
    <li>Of all the possibilities in front of me, which am I most PASSIONATE about? </li>
    <li>Given my powerful WHY, what best achieves my mission in the most realistic, actionable way? </li>
</ul>
<p><br />
You now have your direction.  And you don&rsquo;t have to keep it a secret.  You can also <u>use your <strong>COLLABORATOR </strong>in the Drive Stage</u>: The energy of the Collaborator will help you increase your clarity and commitment as you share it with others and leverage a team to move your mission forward. You might ask:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Who can I share my commitment with to make it real and have them hold me accountable?</li>
    <li>Who could give me good advice on my new commitment and direction?</li>
    <li>Who in my network, or groups outside of my network, would be most interested in what I&rsquo;m doing and how can I make those connections? </li>
</ul>
<p><br />
3.	Third, with your powerful WHY lighting the way (Visionary), and the immediate target defined (Driver), create a plan of action for getting from here to there. Enlist the strength of your <strong>ORGANIZER</strong> and make a list.  Prioritize and order your action steps in a clear way so you know what you must do today in order to see results tomorrow. Ask yourself these questions: </p>
<ul>
    <li>How can I break this task down into a series of actions that take place on a timeline?</li>
    <li>What milestones can I define that will show me I&rsquo;m making progress? </li>
    <li>What information and resources will help me get from here to there?</li>
</ul>
<p><br />
As in earlier steps, <u>use your <strong>COLLABORATOR</strong> during the Organizer stage</u>: This energy helps to make the plan more enjoyable and likely to be executed. You might ask:</p>
<ul>
    <li>How can I make this planning fun, energizing and exciting?</li>
    <li>Who would want to help me in making sure I&rsquo;m covering all the bases? </li>
    <li>When can I celebrate? (perhaps several times, come to think of it) Who can I invite?  </li>
</ul>
<p><br />
4.	As you can see above, it&rsquo;s recommended that you keep your <strong>COLLABORATOR</strong> close by and often engaged. This is the energy that will make this time more fun, and keep you resilient, optimistic and bright. See the Collaborator notes above for integrating this energy through the process. Remember that the Collaborator makes connections and does it with a joyful, energetic spirit. The Collaborator writes emails like this:   </p>
<p><em>&ldquo;Hey Friend, </em> <em>Guess what? The best thing happened to me today! I was fired :-) I&rsquo;ve been dying to get out of this position for months now and they did me the favor kicking me out &ndash; can you believe it?! Anyway, I&rsquo;m spending a few days considering my options. Wanted to let you know I&rsquo;m available and looking for opportunities that will be fun and make a great impact! Let me know if you see something. </em> <em>Lots of love!</em>&rdquo;   </p>
<p>5.	Finally, go back to the <strong>ORGANIZER</strong> and <strong>DRIVER</strong> and get it done! You&rsquo;ve got your direction, you&rsquo;ve got motivation (powerful WHY?), you&rsquo;ve got your network engaged, you&rsquo;ve got your plan &hellip;.now you just need to execute!  Don&rsquo;t get trapped in any one pattern for long though&hellip;use the pulse of push and recovery, the stretch and renew of alternating all 4 patterns to keep you energized.  Go get em&rsquo;! And by the way&hellip;I want to be invited to the party!   </p>
<p><strong>Retreating to the Wrong Pattern</strong>  </p>
<p>A deliberate strategy that engages all 4 patterns and matches the right energy with the right task lets people find their power in difficult situations, and not get stuck in unproductive places.  Many people would face the stress of being fired by retreating into a stuck version of their Home pattern, or force the situation by using the wrong energy at the wrong time.   </p>
<p>For example, someone strong in the Driver might not allow him- or herself to let go for even a few days to explore Visionary possibilities.  Any action may seem better than no action, no matter how blind it is: <em> &ldquo;I&rsquo;ll give it till the end of the day, think of every possibility and then pick the best one and go after it.&rdquo;</em>  </p>
<p>Right&hellip;that&rsquo;ll work really well. Go with that strategy and I&rsquo;ll cross my fingers that your epiphany comes at a scheduled time this afternoon.  </p>
<p>A person stuck in the anxiety of the Organizer might not be able to embrace the Collaborator&rsquo;s networking efforts: <em>&ldquo;I&rsquo;m so embarrassed that I got laid off and I just can&rsquo;t rely on anyone but myself.  What I really need to do is perfect my resume and put it on as many job hunting web sites as possible, and hope nobody I know hears about my bad fortune and thinks poorly of me before I land another job.&rdquo; </em>  </p>
<p>Yikes! Train Wreck ahead&hellip;Disaster awaits&hellip;Red Flag..Red Flag!!   </p>
<p>Many people are getting laid off right now &ndash; and more to come. I have at least 3 people in my immediate network who have been asked to leave their jobs in the past week!  The reality is that most of them will get scared, defensive, and retreat to a home pattern at its worst and/or use the Driver for survival as is our primal instinct to do so, rather than see this as an opportunity to unfold new potential.  Happily, after this conversation, at least one person will act differently.  If faced with a similar situation, I hope I act differently, I hope you act differently, and I hope we&rsquo;re able to help our clients act differently &hellip;that we may all look back on the toughest transitions of our lives as our greatest moments of opening and expansion!  </p>
<p>Enjoy!  </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Ayurvedic Body Types, Yoga and the Patterns]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/19-ayurvedic-body-types-yoga-and-the-patterns.html</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=19</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our colleague, Norma Nielsen, just sent me a note regarding a FEBI program she is looking at for India.  I was reminded of questions I have heard concerning the connection between the patterns and deep elements of the Indian culture. Here's an interesting link you might want to look at: <a title="http://store.chopra.com/dosha-survey.asp?gclid=COipr9Kz95YCFQquGgodnCNSYg" href="http://store.chopra.com/dosha-survey.asp?gclid=COipr9Kz95YCFQquGgodnCNSYg">http://store.chopra.com/dosha-survey.asp?gclid=COipr9Kz95YCFQquGgodnCNSYg</a>.  It's from Deepak Chopra - a quick little quiz for discovering one's Ayurvedic body type in terms of Vata, Pitta and Kapha.  The map to the patterns is not 100%, as many things are mixed together in these body types.  You might take their quiz and discover your own connections.  What I noticed was Vata is mostly Visionary and Organizer (with some Collaborator in the enthusiasm).  Pitta has lots of Driver energy, with others in the background.  And Kapha brings Collaborator energy to the fore.  See where you come out.</p>
<p>In terms of yoga, my dear friend Abhilash Pandya, shared these insights with me around how the different patterns relate to styles of yoga.</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <p>Driver - The Doer, direct and in-your-face. Making things happen. This kind of person would probably be drawn to <strong><em>Raj Yoga</em></strong>. The doing itself. Raj Yoga &ndash; good for the skeptic.</p>
    </li>
    <li>
    <p>Organizer - The Thinker, learns through words and questions. This most closely corresponds to the path of <strong><em>Jhana Yoga</em></strong>.</p>
    </li>
    <li>
    <p>Collaborator - Playful and interactive; sees things in relationship to other things. Always weighing in human, practical terms. The communion aspect of <strong><em>Bhakti Yoga </em></strong>and its emphasis on seeing in relation to what is not would have appeal to this kind of person. Also <strong><em>Karma Yoga </em></strong>here, with practical mindfulness in all things.</p>
    </li>
    <li>
    <p>Visionary - Goes with the Flow, learns by experience, as life flows through. Fits the path of <em><strong>Karma Yoga</strong></em>. Also <em><strong>Bhakti Yoga </strong></em>for the devotional essence seeking person.</p>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>With the practice of yoga so much on the rise, good to know that you can help people find the type of yoga and way of practicing it that will do them the most good.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[The Driver in Me: A program "running in the background"]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/18-the-driver-in-me-a-program-running-in-the-background.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=18</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>I just returned from the FEBI certification training weekend = great people, rich learning!  I've been personally working with the patterns through InterPlay (www.interplay.org) for almost two decades and am inspired by the FEBI's assessment design, making this critical perspective on energy patterns accessible and ready to apply in leading and life.</p>
<p>My own biggest insight in working with my FEBI results is focused on the relationship of my patterns in my process.  I've worked on developing all four patterns over these years. Currently Visionary has moved to the fore as I develop my PhD proposal, and engage in envisioning my unique contribution through this academic work.  Are the Driver and Organizer weak because now they are in 3rd and 4th position in my FEBI?  Having utilized them for 30 years as my &quot;bread and butter&quot; skillset (program director, project manager), I know the answer is no.  In pondering my FEBI, I notice how I have put D and O, as well as the Collaborator, in service of the Visionary.  To use a software metaphor, I see them as &quot;running in the background.&quot; </p>
<p>In my consulting and coaching practice, I notice that I combine patterns and move them to the foreground depending on what role I need to shift into to be an asset to individual client or team in which I participate.</p>
<p>Look forward to dialoging in this community of interest and practice!</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[What's Whole About Leadership]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/17-whats-whole-about-leadership.html</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=17</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>As we open our forum dedicated to the stories and learnings of whole leaders, I thought I&rsquo;d stir up some thoughts on what I mean by whole leadership and why it matters.</p>
<p>Whole Leadership &ndash;  might sound a bit New Age-y to some, as in yesterday&rsquo;s leader could tell people what to do, divide, conquer, and strike fear into people&rsquo;s hearts, but today&rsquo;s leader needs to be more rounded and &rdquo;whole.&rdquo; Or maybe whole leadership sounds like an impossible dream: being all things to all people and situations - the &ldquo;answer&rdquo; to the daunting challenges facing leaders today.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s some truth in these views. Today&rsquo;s leader does need more than a driving, my-way-or-the-highway style to be successful. And today&rsquo;s challenges do call for unprecedented learning agility. But whole leadership is much more than the fashion of the day, but rather a developmental leap to greater awareness and capability &ndash; and those things DO go together. Far from being impossible impostoring, whole leadership is none other than the authentic, value-adding expression of the whole Self.  </p>
<p>But by capital-&ldquo;S&rdquo;-Self, I&rsquo;m speaking to something beyond the ego (hence the developmental leap). N<span style="color: black">ot just our usual thinking self, but a whole mind-body-spirit Self, an energetic and material Self, a paradoxically individuated and interconnected Self.  It is a whole Self that meets diverse challenges with agility, not through impostor-ish surface behaviors, but by deeply engaging and using any of its 4 energy patterns at the right time.  Whole leadership in this sense is not becoming other than who we are, just more clear, free and fully who we are!</span> </p>
<p>How do we become more clear, free and fully who we are? That&rsquo;s one of the things we&rsquo;ll explore in this forum. From birth to death, we&rsquo;re on a path of development that we might describe as growing or shrinking, flowing or stuck, becoming more capable or more of a caricature.  Growth sounds like the only side of this equation we&rsquo;d ever want to be on, but we&rsquo;re paradoxically put together such that the opposite is often true: when we&rsquo;re growing we&rsquo;re not comfortable and when we&rsquo;re comfortable we&rsquo;re not growing.  Challenging learning curves and hardship are known to be reliable catalysts for developing leaders - especially when combined with reflection. This forum might be just the place to do that: reflect on your own pivotal learning experiences and learn from the reflections of others.</p>
<p>The other known catalyst for development are what the great integral philosopher, Ken Wilber, calls &ldquo;integral practices,&rdquo;  that is, integrated mind-body practices that engage and develop the whole person. For example, Wilber cites a study measuring the percent of people at an advanced stage of development he calls &ldquo;Tier II,&rdquo; that we could equate with the capacity for whole leadership. Among the general population, less than 2% are at this stage, however among people who have meditated for at least 3 years the number is 38%. What&rsquo;s chicken and what&rsquo;s egg? I say run your own experiment, and you&rsquo;ll see that it doesn&rsquo;t matter! This forum (and website!) might provide just the spark of inspiration for you to find your own best practice for whole leadership, and to share what&rsquo;s worked for you or for leaders you know.</p>
<p>So whole leadership - and our forum dedicated to its exploration - embraces both the spectrum of agility needed to be an effective leader in the world today, and using our whole selves to foster that critical development. Why does it matter? There are plenty of logical reasons: we&rsquo;re either growing or shrinking &ndash; and whether we&rsquo;re talking about a company or ourselves, navigating the challenges of growth is much more rewarding than is the suffering of being stuck.  But beyond that, if whole leadership is the fullest, value-adding expression of our very nature, what could be more natural than that?</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Reflecting on the European ICF Conference]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/14-reflecting-on-the-european-icf-conference.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=14</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>30,000 feet &ndash; er excuse me, 10,000 meters &ndash; over Germany at the moment, flying home from the European International Coaching Federation Conference in Geneva, Switzerland. Connecting Worlds was the theme of the conference, and I had the honor of being one of its keynote speakers. It came about as one of those simple acts of grace: a timely email from Marijo to Virginia on the very day this intuition-trusting Virginia, organizing a conference for which she was determined to find a female keynoter, had taken the search into her own hands. I think we both sensed the rightness of our connecting.</p>
<p>Grace did not end there. Concentrated in this conference were hundreds of remarkable explorers &ndash; including the quite literal explorer Remy Lecluse who has dragged his skis up and made death-defying descents down more mountains than anyone on earth. &ldquo;How far have you ever fallen,&rdquo; one questioner asked. Remy didn&rsquo;t understand the question, even after it was repeated in his native French. Oh yes, he grasped the words, but &ldquo;fall&rdquo; puzzled him. &ldquo;I&rsquo;ve never fallen,&rdquo; he said, going on to explain what was only now obvious to his audience, &ldquo;If I had fallen I wouldn&rsquo;t be here.&rdquo; What made Remy &ldquo;flawless in his execution?&rdquo; &ndash; the operational objective of so many a business leader. &ldquo;I spend more than 250 days a year in the mountains,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;I become the mountains.&rdquo; Moreover, this &ldquo;becoming&rdquo; plays at the razor&rsquo;s edge of life and death &ndash; not some kind of hazy, lazy one-with-everything bliss, but rather an intense oneness reminiscent of the Zen Master Shosan who would sleep with a sword dangling above his head. To what practice do we commit with such perilous passion to reveal our essential nature?</p>
<p>Another great explorer, George Kohlrieser, spoke the day before me. A former hostage negotiator and now a leadership professor at IMD, George spoke of bonding. &ldquo;Where there is bonding, a difference of opinion is not a conflict,&rdquo; he reminded us, even as he cast an invisible bond among the hundreds of us listening. &ldquo;You&rsquo;re a genius,&rdquo; he had us saying to one another &ndash; on one hand an easy emotional lift, on the other hand such a profoundly deep truth of the enlightened, infinite nature in every one of us.</p>
<p>I spoke of the energy patterns of personality, and how they connect us mind-in-body, and also interconnect us in the world. I had people moving in each of the patterns, checking their reactions, comparing experiences. Having done this countless times in smaller groups, I was still astounded at how, in a matter of seconds, hundreds of people could synchronize their movements in the Organizer pattern! We explored how the patterns show up personally, on teams and in organizations, and how to cultivate a needed pattern at any level. For the rest of the conference, people came up to me to share their experiences of the patterns. &ldquo;I could suddenly see better,&rdquo; one man said of entering the big-picture Visionary pattern. One woman just cried and hugged me. &quot;I get it!&quot; said another, &ldquo;It&rsquo;s so simple and clear.&rdquo; So many of these coaches had been through other somatic learning as part of their coach training, but the patterns pulled something together for them, as they had for me 10 years ago, when the wonderful Betsy Wetzig showed them to me. </p>
<p>Whether it is our mountain, genius, or &ndash; my term &ndash; &ldquo;greatness,&rdquo; I was reminded at this conference how we are all mapping similar territory. Along our particular trajectories to be sure, but we are all describing the journey to an ever-more-capable, ever-more expansive self, to the point where &ldquo;self&rdquo; itself disappears. We&rsquo;re at different places in the journey, carrying different tools and different challenges. And yet, I leave this conference with a sense of the lovely perfection of it all. And a deep appreciation to have joined with hundreds of explorers who are also carving a path for others. <br />
 </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Greetings from the Editor]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/13-greetings-from-the-editor.html</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=13</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to a forum for whole and balanced leaders.  This forum is a place where leaders and coaches can come together, get real about the challenges they face, and share ideas about the best ways forward.  Share stories of your journey using the patterns and how you're navigating the increased demands on leaders today.  Happy blogging:)  Learn, share and have fun!</p>
<p><img height="150" alt="Anthony Attan" width="150" src="http://focusleadership.edit.neptuneweb.com/images/Anthony_BizShot.gif" /></p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Coaching Clients on Physical Activities for the Patterns]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/10-coaching-clients-on-physical-activities-for-the-patterns.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=10</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Q: How, in an actual coaching session, do you recommend physical activities for developing a pattern, beyond just looking over a list of them?</p>
<p>A: It&rsquo;s a great question, and one that I invite other coaches to share their experience on as well. For in landing on the right practices by which our clients can cultivate this or that pattern, we make the patterns deeply personal for our clients, and HOW we do that is deeply personal for us as coaches. This is how I do it: start with exactly where the client is starting:</p>
<p>What are you interested in?</p>
<p>What do you love to do?</p>
<p>What renews you?</p>
<p>What did you used to make time for that you no longer do?</p>
<p>These are the sorts of questions I might ask. And then I listen deeply for whether they know what&rsquo;s good for them or are they lost? In particular, is there something they name that could be done in the energy of the pattern they want to cultivate? And can we identify some strengths that will help them strengthen a weak pattern? </p>
<p>For example, one client, I&rsquo;ll call her Margie, was a strong Driver and wanted to develop more Visionary. Other things I knew about Margie was she had a strong sense of responsibility (i.e., especially not letting others down), her health was starting to fail, and she was Driver-determined to &ldquo;make war&rdquo; (her words) on getting her life back. When I asked her about practices already in her life, she said she used to go to the gym and weightlift, but didn&rsquo;t have time for it anymore &ndash; classic Driver! &ndash; but she knew she needed to get back to it. She also loved cooking, gardening, just being out in nature, but didn&rsquo;t have time for those things either.</p>
<p>Already she had given me plenty of clues. We talked about converting her &ldquo;make war&rdquo; determination into committed time for a renewing practice. Using her Driver strength and sense of responsibility, I suggested keeping score (&ldquo;Give yourself a point each day that you stick to your commitment, and set a target for, say, 70 points this quarter. Make a bet with a friend. If you don&rsquo;t hit 70 points by end of the quarter, you owe her something you&rsquo;ve agreed on.&rdquo;)</p>
<p>Now that we had a wedge of time, how could Margie best fill it? She wanted to get back to weightlifting a couple times a week, and I told her that was great, but don&rsquo;t expect that to develop the Visionary. It would be important renewal time for her, however, and would keep refreshing her &ldquo;make war&rdquo; determination, so I didn&rsquo;t try to talk her out of it. &ldquo;In addition,&rdquo; I asked, and this is where the pattern activity lists come in, &ldquo;Would you consider Tai Chi once a week? Done with a friend (whom she wouldn&rsquo;t want to let down, of course!). In general, this is where in a coaching conversation I might bring out the lists. Do any of these speak to you? Which of these are you already doing? Which are you curious about?</p>
<p>As for Tai Chi and Margie, she said she would think about it, but in a way that made me think she&rsquo;d do nothing more than think about it. But the seed was planted, I let it go. In the meantime, gardening was already a passion (and on the Visionary list); could she commit to an hour a week being one with her garden? And doing it in a sort of Visionary way &ndash; creating, making spaces, feeling into the nature of what wants to happen in a semi-shaded part of her yard? She was quite charged about this possibility, and I could hear it would have enough energy to get started. She also wanted to add a Visionary walk at lunch through a park near where she worked &ndash; a midday refresher that would also spark ideas for her own garden. Twenty minutes for her walks, an hour a week for her gardening, weightlifting twice a week, and a bet with a friend wrapped around all of it &ndash; a perfect starting practice for this Driver!</p>
<p>So there is a place for the lists &ndash; i.e., those development activities listed in the end of chapters in Move to Greatness, or in the Development Recommendations of a FEBI report &ndash; but I suggest not starting with them, but rather starting with where our client starts, listening for how we can build on strengths and current passions, and making connections to what we hear will resonate for him or her.</p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[Coaching Around the Bottom of the Work Behaviors List]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/11-coaching-around-the-bottom-of-the-work-behaviors-list.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=11</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Q: I'm working with a highly discplined business owner who has &ldquo;making work fun&rdquo; at the bottom of the activity list. Are there particular things you recommend for people on their own, knowing they see a trade-off between &quot;fun&quot; and getting tasks done.</p>
<p>A: Let me address several questions embedded in here. First, when I coach around activities that people have listed at the bottom of the activity table, I ask them how important those things are to their work right now. Since this part of the instrument is a forced choice, there will always be activities at the bottom; being at the bottom is not necessarily a bad sign. But it is something to think about, especially when those activities come out of a weaker pattern. Do they do them enough? What might they get out of doing them more? &ldquo;Making work fun&rdquo; being at the bottom particularly resonates with me &ndash; probably because I&rsquo;ve lived that way, too, and I see it so often among Driven, Organized leaders and entrepreneurs. If Collaborator is someone&rsquo;s weakest pattern, I might inquire as to whether she&rsquo;s bringing enough joy out to draw others toward her and engender cooperation. Does she need to lighten up more &ndash; not only for her health, but also for the brightness and positive emotions that are so positively contagious to others. If she already has a good dose of Collaborator energy, no problem. But if this being at the bottom is symptomatic of a sort of relentless driving nature, I&rsquo;d recommend some fun breaks - ideally with others. Whether people are on their own or not, I always look at how they can use their strengths and their present life as a way to move in the direction they&rsquo;d like to. So, if this person is very disciplined, to use your example, maybe a disciplined approach to &ldquo;fun&rdquo; would appeal to her &ndash; as in buying theatre tickets for a season that enforces the discipline of a weekly fun break. If she has a pet, maybe play with it daily. If this person loves to cook, maybe join or create a cooking group with a few friends and enjoy a roving dinner once or twice a month. But as much as I&rsquo;m a fan of practice and appreciate the patterns as a map for how to move in desired directions, I never force practice on people. If their life is working, if their leadership is working, whatever the context we&rsquo;re coaching in, they don&rsquo;t have to do anything. Maybe just being aware of the patterns for awhile is the best &ldquo;prescription.&rdquo; Awareness itself propels our growth when we&rsquo;re ready to go there. <br />
 </p>]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[When Weak Patterns are Top Activities]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/12-when-weak-patterns-are-top-activities.html</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=12</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>Q: In the Work Behaviors table in the FEBI report, people don't necessarily find their preferred patterns at the top. I had a case where a client's weakest pattern (in overall profile) was among the top in work behaviors. Also she said that she finds work exhausting, which I interpreted as those top couple of behaviors, coming from a weak pattern, required the greatest amount of energy. Was I accurate? </p>
A: Sometimes the Work Behaviors table matches the overall energy profile and other times it does not. Both cases are instructive, but in different ways. In the case you mention, where someone places activities high on the Work Behavior table, but those activities map to patterns she&rsquo;s weak in, your observation that no wonder she finds these exhausting is probably right on. I often ask people when weak patterns appear at the top of the Work Behaviors table whether they think they&rsquo;re really getting into the &ldquo;right&rdquo; pattern when they do those activities. Or are they trying to do them out of their Home pattern, and it&rsquo;s not working so well? Either case can be exhausting. Their exhaustion can be reduced by accessing the right pattern with less energy.]]></description>

        </item><item>
                         <title><![CDATA[A Message From the Roadie]]></title><link>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/6-a-message-from-the-roadie.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Focus Leadership</dc:creator><guid>http://www.focusleadership.com/blog/index.html?id=6</guid>                      <description><![CDATA[<p>6 months...</p>
<p>40 cities...</p>
<p>4 countries...</p>
<p>56 engagements...</p>
<p>thousands of books...</p>
<p>and a ton of great laughs, inspiring stories, insights to die for and people I'll never forget! </p>
<p>For those of you who welcomed us into your businesses, organizations, and homes...to those of you who played full out and shared your stories of success and struggle...to those of you made this tour possible and made this tour an unbelievable success, I thank you with all that I am! <br />
<br />
I didn't get to attend all these events in all these cities but I made it to most of them and its an experience I'll draw from for a long time. Being an executive coach, business development guy and researcher with Focus is great and all...but I had a chance to be a <strong>roadie</strong> for a short period of time and the one-woman band I was following around was well worth the effort! </p>
<p>To the people that came up to us after our events and told us stories of insight and transformation, barriers broken and new hope, I am most grateful. I continue to get stories coming in of people who have read the Move to Greatness book and are breaking down perceived walls, playing with their life in whole new ways, seeing unforetold possibilities, and getting their act together like never before. The patterns seemed to reach such a diversity of people and were so broadly applicable to their lives that is was moving to see and inspiring for my own development as a person and a professional coach.</p>
<p>I had one person come up to me recently and say &quot;I <u>never</u> read books like this and I read this one because I was inspired by Ginny's energy and presentation. I am such a collaborator - visionary and I've always struggled to stay organized and stick up for myself at work, this has given me new hope and I can see a way to access more of that energy now&quot;. You go girl! Keep up the great work and thanks for putting your whole self into the patterns and getting great results! <br />
<br />
I know there were  thousands of people that walked away from these event with a book in hand and I'd love to hear your stories about how reading the book has helped you out - or perhaps where you're still stuck and we could lend a hand. Best wishes and many thanks to all of you and I hope our paths will cross again soon! <br />
<br />
- Bob Caron<br />
 </p>]]></description>

        </item></channel></rss>